Vitenskapelig artikkel   2016

Bai, Aleksander; Mork, Heidi Camilla; Schulz, Trenton; Fuglerud, Kristin Skeide

Publikasjonsdetaljer

Tidsskrift:

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 229, p. 506–516, 2016

Utgiver:

IOS Press

Internasjonale standardnumre:

Trykt: 0926-9630
Elektronisk: 1879-8365

Lenker:

DOI: doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-684-2-506

We examined fourteen accessibility evaluation methods and put them into four categories based on the knowledge and resources required to perform them. We also classified the methods based on whether they evaluated technical or usable accessibility. Then, we selected four of these methods from different categories to evaluate accessibility of an e-ID solution. We looked for confusing and critical issues. Each method found unique issues and overlapping issues, but no single method found more than half of the issues. This information should help inform future accessibility evaluations of other solutions and can aid other teams in selecting methods based on their specific goals and resources.